| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 |
101. Empire in its current state. - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
-1 OP Please explain which singular merc entity will be capable of holding there own aganst the likes of GSF? Like for like case please for this scenario doesnt really work with your simple ill thought out and obviously merc centric war proposals...
- by Grumpy Owly - at 2012.06.14 07:10:00
|
102. CCP; a numbers question if i may - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
One aspect to consider about the relative attractiveness of low sec may not be to simply look at it as gradiating things based on what the game likes to deliniate regions on the risk/reward curve but actually looking at "unique" (key word) feature...
- by Grumpy Owly - at 2012.06.13 22:05:00
|
103. Bounty Office - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
Seems to be some very similar echoing designs as per others have promoted for BH. Please expand the interest to the EVE political arena if you will as historically all the various requests for a long time for reperation to the BH system have simp...
- by Grumpy Owly - at 2012.06.13 21:14:00
|
104. Wars, Allies and the Mercenary Market - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Olleybear wrote: Love the OP post. Good post. One thing I would like to add, in case someone else hasnt already, is having a place Mercs can advertise their services, prices, area of operation, etc. Defenders could then browse the ads and pick...
- by Grumpy Owly - at 2012.06.13 15:09:00
|
105. CSM 7 Spring Summit Review - Parts I & II - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Nice coverage of the CSM summit Seleene. Really nice to see the transparency and accountability improved as per previous debates and it's relevance recgonised to the EVE community. I know you were keen to help deliver this to the EVE community per...
- by Grumpy Owly - at 2012.06.13 14:16:00
|
106. The weak, and the strong - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
baltec1 wrote: Tesal wrote: "Ganking concerns for mining" Out of those 4k miners 99% had no or near to no tank. Just be aware that just trying to use bling wont really help you. Better advice However, adaptation to a point whils...
- by Grumpy Owly - at 2012.06.13 09:48:00
|
107. The weak, and the strong - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Typical plug from me as its another "ganker/bear" (used for effect) debate. ;) [salespitch]Whilst I wouldn't expect it to be the "holy grail" to the end of all forum warriors or the ongoing debate needed with CCP constantly evolving the game I ha...
- by Grumpy Owly - at 2012.06.13 08:52:00
|
108. Wars, Allies and the Mercenary Market - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Alavaria Fera wrote: RubyPorto wrote: I think there are also a good number of wardecs you can Ally yourself into if you want to fight goonswarm. ... WARNING: You may be unable to leave the war until we drop it. Allied help I believe ...
- by Grumpy Owly - at 2012.06.13 03:26:00
|
109. Wars, Allies and the Mercenary Market - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
RubyPorto wrote: Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote: FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote: Also, it costs a small fortune for a 1-man corp to wardec Goonswarm, and a pittance for Goonswarm to wardec a 1-man corp. Instead, I suggest basing the wardec cost on t...
- by Grumpy Owly - at 2012.06.13 03:15:00
|
110. Suicide Gankers - The New Soon to be Carebears or Not? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Suicide gankers I have to agree are like little girls with a spreadsheet mentality to EVE achievements. But moreso pathetic that they operate under broken bounty hunter mechanics which would be one obvious nominal risk element afforded to the crim...
- by Grumpy Owly - at 2012.06.12 11:07:00
|
111. GRIEFERS - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Pointless arguing with the gankers and affiliated proponents, they are only motivated by a selfish need to keep life easy for themselves or allow a better profit line on the gank, your literally wasting time arguing with them as they don't care ab...
- by Grumpy Owly - at 2012.06.12 06:51:00
|
112. Thank You CCP, Goons & EVE Players in General - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
lmao, And the mighty Goonswarm Federation decides to war dec my 3 man corp for having an opinion about them. Gosh how scared you must be if you have to resort to having to use IG tactics to try and silence opposition on the forums to your point ...
- by Grumpy Owly - at 2012.06.12 04:21:00
|
113. Thank You CCP, Goons & EVE Players in General - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
David Cedarbridge wrote: Grumpy Owly wrote: Bossy Lady wrote: Grumpy Owly wrote: Not mad or upset, just not inspired by Goons. Suicide ganking is a calculated risk under high sec regulations that uses the element of suprise on soft ta...
- by Grumpy Owly - at 2012.06.11 12:50:00
|
114. Thank You CCP, Goons & EVE Players in General - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Richard Desturned wrote: Grumpy Owly wrote: Well they aren't promoting it or welcoming it. So they must be concerned it might effect them. members of a nullsec alliance don't care about bounty hunting mechanics, news at 11 herpderp, hu...
- by Grumpy Owly - at 2012.06.11 12:38:00
|
115. Thank You CCP, Goons & EVE Players in General - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
SetrakDark wrote: hahahaha goondevs are squashing bounty hunting fixes out of fear...FEAR holy **** you tinfoil mongoloids take a shower, shave, go outside, get a life Well they aren't promoting it or welcoming it. So they must be conce...
- by Grumpy Owly - at 2012.06.11 12:25:00
|
116. Thank You CCP, Goons & EVE Players in General - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Bossy Lady wrote: Grumpy Owly wrote: Not mad or upset, just not inspired by Goons. Suicide ganking is a calculated risk under high sec regulations that uses the element of suprise on soft targets in the main. Its more a spreadsheet exercise...
- by Grumpy Owly - at 2012.06.11 12:17:00
|
117. Thank You CCP, Goons & EVE Players in General - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Not mad or upset, just not inspired by Goons. Suicide ganking is a calculated risk under high sec regulations. Its more a spreadsheet exercise than inspirational gameplay not very exciting and when examples suggest you can plex in an afternoon, a...
- by Grumpy Owly - at 2012.06.11 11:19:00
|
118. CSM7 Summit Topic: Industry & Mining - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Lord Zim wrote: While the bounty system Malcanis came up with has a lot of merit, it's not particularly related to neither industry nor mining. Wardec/crimewatch is probably the more correct avenue, and oh wait I see you've already posted it th...
- by Grumpy Owly - at 2012.06.11 10:12:00
|
119. CSM7 Summit Topic: Null Sec - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Lord Zim wrote: I thought you had Issler. vOv Except again you missunderstand, my point was about official Goon CSM representation or the obvious lack of it, not about any CSM member representing mining. Besides there are other candidates re...
- by Grumpy Owly - at 2012.06.11 10:07:00
|
120. Thank You CCP, Goons & EVE Players in General - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Why thank the Goons, they are slowly promoting EVE into a gank fest playground for little girls? What's so impressive about shooting soft industrials as is their unique aspect of agenda they promote for EVE? Especially when they hide behind broken...
- by Grumpy Owly - at 2012.06.11 09:47:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |